Legal Opinion
Tillberry v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided October 31, 2008No. 49A05-0803-CR-145PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MAY, Judge.
Henry Tillberry appeals the revocation of his probation. Because he was not afforded due process and because the trial court’s findings are unsupported by evidence, we must reverse.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On December 2007, Tillberry pled guilty to Class A misdemeanor criminal mischief. His sentence included 345 days of probation, which was scheduled to begin on December 20, 2007.
On January 31, 2008, the State filed a Notice of Probation Revocation that alleged Tillberry:
1. failed to report to the Probation Department as directed.
2. failed to submit his baseline urine…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Prewitt v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
- Woods v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
- Townsend v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Kimberly Heaton v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
- Beeler v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Cooper v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
- Dontae M. Clark v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- M.T. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.