M.T. v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MAY, Judge.
The trial court modified M.T.'s probation and committed him to the Department of Correction after a hearing at which the State presented no evidence of the probation violations it alleged. That violated MT due process rights, and we accordingly reverse.1
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In March of 2009, M.T. admitted he committed an offense that would be criminal trespass if committed by an adult. At that time he was on probation for a separate true finding. The juvenile court accepted M.T.'s admission of delinquency, ordered a suspended commitment to the Department of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- J.S. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- In re K.G.Indiana Supreme Court · 2004
- Johnson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
- Hunt v. ShettleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Briesacher v. Specialized Restoration & Construction, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- K.A. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- A.A.Q. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- C.B. v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- AAQ v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- B K v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2024
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.