Legal Opinion

Mid-Hudson Valley Federal Credit Union v. Quartararo & Lois, PLLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 9, 2017No. 524562Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partGarry, J.

We concur with the majority that plaintiff’s cause of action for fraud must be dismissed, as it was not pleaded with the high level of specificity and detail required by CPLR 3016 (b). However, fraud is one of just a few causes of action singled out in the CPLR for such heightened standards of particularity in pleading (see CPLR 3016). In contrast, the standards of specificity for legal malpractice, like most other causes of action, are governed by principles of notice pleading, which “are designed to focus attention on whether the pleader has a cause of action rather than on whether he [or…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Leon v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Rovello v. Orofino Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Foley v. D'AgostinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
  4. Maas v. Cornell UniversityNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Connaughton v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2017

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API