Legal Opinion
James v. Wash Depot Holdings, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided May 14, 2007No. 05-60822CIVPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES
DIMITROULEAS, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Defendants Wash Depot Holding’s Inc. and Wash Depot XV, Inc.’s, Amended Motion for Attorney’s Fees [DE 168]. The Court has carefully considered the Motion [DE 168], Plaintiff Rodney James’ Response to Defendants’ Amended Motion [DE 173], Defendants’ Original Motion For Attorneys’ Fees [DE 138], Plaintiffs Response [DE 146], Defendants’ Reply [DE 154], Plaintiffs Memorandum Regarding the Reasonableness of Attorneys Fees [DE 192], Defendants’ Memorandum Regarding Reasonableness…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- TGI Friday's, Inc. v. DvorakSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
- McMahan v. TotoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Eagleman v. EaglemanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Joseph Young v. New Process Steel, LPCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Smith v. Psychiatric Solutions, Inc.District Court, N.D. Florida · 2012
- Pickett ex rel. Estate of Pickett v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2013
- Hsi Chang v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2015