Legal Opinion

Ortiz v. Associated Employers Lloyds

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 10, 1956No. 11733PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, Justice.

Appellant did not 'file the record in this cause within the sixty-day period as required by Rule 386, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, and on August 28, 1956, filed his motion in this Court which omitting the formal parts reads:

“Comes now Fred Ortiz, Appellant in the above entitled and numbered cause and moves. the Court to grant him an extension of time for filing the statement of facts and transcript in this Court for the reason that although such instruments have recently been completed and have been delivered to the attorneys for the appellee for inspection and approval, the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Matlock v. MatlockTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Walker v. CleereTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Hanna v. Home Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  4. Pioneer American Ins. Co. v. KnoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  5. Eldridge v. Lake Whitney Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Consolidated Casualty Insurance Company v. WadeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  2. Dellerman v. TragerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  3. Gibbs v. MeltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  4. Williams v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  5. Home Fund, Inc. v. GarlandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API