Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Ramon Rios-Ortiz

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 22, 1987No. 86-5340PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge:

Appellant Ramon Rios-Ortiz pleaded guilty and was convicted of assaulting a border patrol officer. Following the plea, but before final sentencing, he moved to withdraw the plea pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(d), stating that he had changed his mind and wished to go to trial on a theory of self-defense. The district court denied the motion and Rios-Ortiz appeals.

Under Rule 32(d) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the court may permit the presentence withdrawal of a guilty plea upon a showing by the defendant of “any fair and just reason.” 1…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Sydney B. Kadwell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  2. United States v. Howard E. SaftCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  3. United States v. Jane ReadCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. United States v. Robert MichaelsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  5. United States v. Judy Marietta CastelloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. United States v. Arch A. Moore, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
  2. Ramee Jamal Shah, Aka: Eddie Harris, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  3. United States v. Hector Martin RamosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. United States v. Mickey Turner, United States of America v. Kenneth Raven Beler, United States of America v. Anthony Lee SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. Frank R. AlberCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API