Legal Opinion

Dunlap v. City of Southfield

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 23, 1974No. Docket 17649PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeneweth, J.

The plaintiffs are Southfield property owners representing a class of residents living in the area of a condominium development proposed by the defendants Realty Ventures and Rembrandt Enterprises (hereinafter referred to as the developers). Plaintiffs’ cornplaint for an order of superintending control against the City of Southfield consisted of five counts. The defendant developers moved for accelerated and summary judgment. The trial court granted the motion, and the plaintiffs appeal.

The asserted grounds on the combined motion for accelerated and summary judgment were that the issues…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Drouillard v. City of RosevilleMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. Parshay v. Warden of Marquette PrisonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Tudryck v. MutchMichigan Supreme Court · 1948

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Senior Accountants, Analysts & Appraisers Ass'n v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Pontiac Fire Fighters Union Local 376 v. City of PontiacMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Michigan AFSCME Council 25 v. Woodhaven-Brownstown School DistrictMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Senior Accountants, Analysts & Appraisers Ass'n v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Kelly Services, Inc. v. MarzulloDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API