Schofield v. Palmer
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Virginia
At Law.
1Opinion of the Court
McDOWFLL, District Judge.
These were sundry motions for judgment under section 3211, Code Va. 1887 [Ann. Code 190-4, p. 1686], made by the receiver of a New York national bank. This statute, so far as now of interest, reads: “Any person entitled to recover money by action on any contract may * * * obtain judgment for such money after fifteen days’ notice.”
The plaintiff being a nonresident of this state, in each of the cases the defendants who appeared suggested the nonresidence of the plaintiff, and moved for security for costs. Under section 3539, Code 1887 [Ann. Code 1904, p. 1891], and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- In Re ChetwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Chapin v. . DobsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Nicholls v. WebbSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
- New Orleans v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1836
- Auten v. United States Nat. Bank of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Uranium Antitrust Litigation. Westinghouse Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Chisholm v. GilmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- City of Danville v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1940
- Lehman v. SpurwayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
- Farrell v. StoddardDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.