Legal Opinion
Chidester v. City of Newark
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 15, 1910No. L-5568PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FAKE, District Judge.
This is an ejectment suit. Pursuant to written stipulation the issues involved are *893to be tried before the Court without a jury. Counsel have further stipulated that pending the taking of testimony and for the purpose of clarifying the issues which may be raised at the trial, a question bearing upon the construction of the deeds which lie at the base of the suit be first disposed of.
One James Searing made three certain deeds to the Morris Canal and Banking Company. The first is dated January 11, 1830, the second, March 28, 1833, and the third, March 1, 1856. The immediate…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Sellick v. Jersey Central Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1940
- Staffordville Gravel Co. v. NewellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1891
3Cited by4 opinions
- Chidester v. City of NewarkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
- Chidester v. City of NewarkDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1945
- Harrison Central Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1944
- Wilomay Holding Co. v. McCoyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958