Legal Opinion

Harrison Central Corp. v. United States

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided January 18, 1944No. Civil Action No. 1066PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FAKE, District Judge.

The issues here to be disposed of arise on a motion made by the defendant for summary judgment in its favor under Rule 56 of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, it being asserted that there are no genuine issues as to any of the material facts.

The complaint discloses that plaintiff was (the successful bidder at an auction sale covering the old Post Office site on Broad Street in the City of Newark, and thereafter on July 14, 1937, entered into a written contract of sale with the defendant. Plaintiff prays that the contract be reformed in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chidester v. City of NewarkDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1910
  2. Chidester v. City of NewarkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Geyer v. BookwalterDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API