Nischke v. Aetna Health Plans
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
HOOVER, EJ.
¶ 1. Lois and Donald Nischke 1 appeal a judgment determining there is no uninsured motorist coverage available under their automobile insurance policy from Partners Mutual Insurance Company. The Nischkes assert that a "drive other car" exclusion, which Partners invoked to deny coverage, is contrary to Wis. Stat. § 632.32(6)(b)2.a. 2 We conclude the exclusion is permitted under and consistent with § 632.32(5)(j) and we affirm the judgment.
Background
¶ 2. On September 23, 2003, Nischke was driving a vehicle owned by her mother-in-law, Dorothy, who lives with the Nischkes. Victor…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
- Ferdon Ex Rel. Petrucelli v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation FundWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- Welch v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
- Hutson v. State Personnel CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Doe 1 v. Archdiocese of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2010
- Ecker Bros. v. Calumet CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009
- Grand View Windows, Inc. v. BrandtCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2013