Legal Opinion

Nischke v. Aetna Health Plans

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided November 4, 2008No. 2008AP807PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOVER, EJ.

¶ 1. Lois and Donald Nischke 1 appeal a judgment determining there is no uninsured motorist coverage available under their automobile insurance policy from Partners Mutual Insurance Company. The Nischkes assert that a "drive other car" exclusion, which Partners invoked to deny coverage, is contrary to Wis. Stat. § 632.32(6)(b)2.a. 2 We conclude the exclusion is permitted under and consistent with § 632.32(5)(j) and we affirm the judgment.

Background

¶ 2. On September 23, 2003, Nischke was driving a vehicle owned by her mother-in-law, Dorothy, who lives with the Nischkes. Victor…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Green Spring Farms v. KerstenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Ferdon Ex Rel. Petrucelli v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation FundWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Welch v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Hutson v. State Personnel CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Doe 1 v. Archdiocese of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2010
  2. Ecker Bros. v. Calumet CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009
  3. Grand View Windows, Inc. v. BrandtCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API