Daggs v. Klein
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORR, Circuit Judge.
Two separate suits were instituted in the District Court and motions to dismiss were heard before different judges. In the Daggs case the complaint was dismissed on the ground that no federal question was presented, and the Braito case was dismissed on the ground that the Secretary of the Navy, to whom we shall hereinafter refer as the Secretary, is an indispensable party. The cases were consolidated for argument and presentation on appeal.
The pertinent facts, as alleged in the complaints, are: Appellants Daggs and Braito were federal civil service employees stationed at…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Williams v. FanningSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
3Cited by20 opinions
- Neal Clark v. State of Washington, and Washington State Bar Association, an Agency of State Government, the State Bar of California, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Fahey v. O'Melveny & Myers Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco v. O'Melveny & MyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Marshall v. WymanDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1955
- Heikkila v. BarberDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1958
- Fischer v. HaeberleDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1948
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.