Legal Opinion
Roth v. Baldwin
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided December 10, 1934No. 6230PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.
Suit was brought in the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia by the receiver of the Commercial National Bank, of Washington, against Martin Roth, defendant, to recover the sum of $16,700, with interest, being the amount assessed by the Acting Comptroller of the Currency against the defendant, as the holder of 167 shares of the capital stock of the Commercial National Bank.
In the particulars of demand it is alleged by the Acting Comptroller of the Currency that “upon a proper accounting by the receiver heretofore appointed to collect the assets of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kennedy v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Keyser v. HitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Williams v. RoseDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1914
- Wingate v. OrchardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1896
- Hobart v. GouldDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1881
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cooper v. O'CONNORCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- Booth v. FletcherCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Bank of America National Trust and Savings AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Springfield v. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949
- Roach v. StastnyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.