Syblis v. Attorney General of the United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FISHER, Circuit Judge.
This appeal arises from the entry of an order of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(1)(B).1 An Immigration Judge (“IJ”) found petitioner removable and ineligible for cancellation of removal, and the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirmed. Petitioner concedes removability under § 1227(a)(1)(B), but contests the adverse determination of his eligibility for cancellation of removal. Because petitioner has failed to meet his statutorily prescribed burden of demonstrating eligibility for relief from removal, we will affirm.
I. Facts & Procedural…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Schaffer Ex Rel. Schaffer v. WeastSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Jean-Louis v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Sandoval-Lua v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- John Doe v. Princeton UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
- Lucio-Rayos v. SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Mena-Flores v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Peralta Sauceda v. LynchCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
- Aracely Marinelarena v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.