Legal Opinion

Durant v. Stahlin

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1965No. Calendar 31-33, Docket 50,598-50,600Published

1Opinion of the Court

375 Mich. 628 (1965)

135 N.W.2d 392

DURANT

v.

STAHLIN.

APPEAL in re VAN DUSEN, ELLIOTT, ROMNEY.

Calendar Nos. 31-33, Docket Nos. 50,598-50,600.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided June 7, 1965.

Davidow & Davidow (Larry S. Davidow, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Dickinson, Wright, McKean & Cudlip (Fred W. Freeman and George B. Martin, of counsel), for defendants Van Dusen and Elliott.

Cross, Wrock, Miller, Vieson & Kelley (Bethel B. Kelley, W. Robert Chandler, Thomas G. Sawyer, and Newman T. Guthrie, of counsel), for defendant Romney.

ADAMS, J.

This appeal from orders of the trial court granting motions for…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API