Durant v. Stahlin
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
375 Mich. 628 (1965)
135 N.W.2d 392
DURANT
v.
STAHLIN.
APPEAL in re VAN DUSEN, ELLIOTT, ROMNEY.
Calendar Nos. 31-33, Docket Nos. 50,598-50,600.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Decided June 7, 1965.
Davidow & Davidow (Larry S. Davidow, of counsel), for plaintiff.
Dickinson, Wright, McKean & Cudlip (Fred W. Freeman and George B. Martin, of counsel), for defendants Van Dusen and Elliott.
Cross, Wrock, Miller, Vieson & Kelley (Bethel B. Kelley, W. Robert Chandler, Thomas G. Sawyer, and Newman T. Guthrie, of counsel), for defendant Romney.
ADAMS, J.
This appeal from orders of the trial court granting motions for…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.