State v. Carter
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtIreland, J.
Two off-duty investigators discovered an illegally modified firearm at a gun training class. The trial court suppressed the gun at trial, holding that the off-duty investigators should not have examined or seized the gun without a warrant. The Court of Appeals affirmed and the State appeals. The defendant had no expectation of privacy in his rifle when he put it in open view of the class and invited the students to handle it. Therefore, we hold that the investigators did not need a warrant to examine the rifle. We also hold that exigent circumstances existed which entitled the investigators…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. GunwallWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- State v. AthanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. AthanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. HintonWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. CarterWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. TibblesWashington Supreme Court · 2010
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.