Legal Opinion

Krupp v. Poor

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1970No. 69-465PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStern, J.

The issue presented is whether the trial court properly exercised judicial discretion in preventing inquiry of prospective jurors concerning their own or their immediate family members’ connection with, interest in, or relationship to a casualty insurance company in an assault and battery case in which defense counsel informed the court prior to this examination out of the presence and hearing of the prospective jurors that one defendant was uninsured and that the other defendant was insured?

“The purpose of the examination of a prospective juror upon his voir dire is to determine whether he…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. FerrantoOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  2. State v. WinneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  3. Pavilonis v. ValentineOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Dowd-Feder, Inc. v. TruesdellOhio Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Vega, Admr. v. EvansOhio Supreme Court · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. DeHart v. Aetna Life InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. McQueen v. GoldeyOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. State v. SowdersOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. BridgemanOhio Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. In re Guardianship of WonderlyOhio Supreme Court · 1981

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API