Legal Opinion
Switzer v. Joseph
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided June 11, 1969No. 11624PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’QUINN, Justice.
The question to be decided in this case is whether there is sufficient evidence to support jury findings that appellant was party to a conspiracy to defraud and knowingly benefited thereby.
William Joseph, appellee, brought this lawsuit against James H. Kuenstler, James L. Kuenstler, William Raschke, Rudy Vil-lareal, John W. Switzer, and K & S, Inc., and alleged that the defendants conspired (1) to misappropriate funds of a business enterprise, existing between Joseph and James H. Kuenstler, and (2) to defraud Joseph.
Before trial Joseph filed a voluntary nonsuit as to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Joske v. IrvineTexas Supreme Court · 1898
- Schlumberger Well Surveying Corp. v. Nortex Oil & Gas Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. Standard Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1937
- Great National Life Insurance Co. v. ChapaTexas Supreme Court · 1964
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,777, 11 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 781 Chemetron Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. Business Funds, Inc., Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Davis-Lynch, Inc. v. MorenoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- Guynn v. Corpus Christi Bank & TrustCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Eugenio Riquelme Valdes, Inmobiliaria Kan Kun, S.A. v. Leisure Resource Group, Inc., Capitol Savings & Loan Association and United Service CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Southwest Bank & Trust Co. v. Bankers Commercial Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.