Legal Opinion
Ransome Concrete Machinery Co. v. United Concrete Machinery Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 7, 1910No. 54PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Suit in equity by the Ransome Concrete Machinery Company against the United Concrete Machinery Company. Decree for complainant, and defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
NOYES, Circuit Judge.
This is a suit to restrain the alleged infringement of letters patent No. 814,803, issued to Ernest Leslie Ran-some on March 13, 1906, for an improvement in concrete-mixing machines, and assigned to the complainant.
The patentee states at the commencement of his specifications:
“My invention relates to that type of mixers known as ‘batch mixers,’ in which the material to be mixed is placed into the mixer a hatch or charge at a time, and is in like manner discharged when mixed.”
“Batch mixers” are to be distinguished from “continuous mixers.” The latter are long cylindrical…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mast, Foos & Co. v. Stover Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Brown v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Potts v. CreagerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
3Cited by3 opinions
- J. H. Day Co. v. Mountain City Mill Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1920
- Barkis v. California Almond Growers' ExchangeDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1925
- J. H. Day Co. v. Mountain City Mill Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1918