Commonwealth v. Ferguson
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtGreenberg, J.
A six-person jury in the District Court found the defendant, Scott Ferguson, guilty of two counts of assault and battery by means of a dangerous weapon (shod foot) and of knowingly receiving a stolen motor vehicle. We conclude that there was error in the judge’s refusal to charge the jury on the accident defense and in his definition of the crime of assault and battery by means of a dangerous weapon. Accordingly, the defendant’s assault and battery convictions must be reversed. We affirm the conviction of knowingly receiving a stolen motor vehicle.. We recite the pertinent facts.
The “Acre”…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Quincy Mutual Fire Insurance v. AbernathyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Commonwealth v. FordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Commonwealth v. GoodwinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- Commonwealth v. AzarMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
- Commonwealth v. MooreMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
- Commonwealth v. FigueroaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.