Legal Opinion

Gould v. People

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 1, 1976No. Civ. 46133PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HANSON, J.

The Case

Plaintiffs-appellants Kenneth Gould, Lewis Kaufman and Maklo Corporation (hereinafter plaintiffs) brought an action in the form of a taxpayer’s suit pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 526a to enjoin defendants-respondents from prosecuting certain obscenity cases brought against them under Penal Code section 311.2 and seeking to have defendants reimburse the city and county for moneys expended in prosecuting the cases.

The plaintiffs named as defendants in the complaint the People of the State of California and certain governmental officers in their official…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Hicks v. MirandaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Van Atta v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Woodard v. Southern California Permanente Medical GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. Los Altos Property Owners Assn. v. HutcheonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. People v. Javier A.California Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Lyons v. Santa Barbara County Sheriff's OfficeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API