Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Armstrong

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1918No. 14279PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pacific county, Hewen, J., entered January 6,1917, dismissing an action for an injunction, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWebster, J.

On April 29,1913, James P. Armstrong obtained a decree of divorce from the respondent, Florence Armstrong, and on November 5, 1913, married Lulu 0. Armstrong, the appellant herein. By the decree of divorce, James P. Armstrong was awarded all of the property theretofore acquired by the parties, which consisted of a building and personalty therein situate in Eaymond, Washington; the decree further providing that he should pay to his divorced wife, so long as she remained unmarried, alimony in the sum of $35 per month. The respondent, Florence Armstrong, did not appear in the action, but the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Prewit v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Nance v. NanceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
  3. Boggess v. Richards's Adm'rWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Allen v. KaneWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. National Surety Co. v. UddWashington Supreme Court · 1911

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Davis v. NielsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
  2. Knettle v. KnettleWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Dunham v. TabbCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  4. Allard v. La PlainWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Columbia International Corp. v. PerryWashington Supreme Court · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API