Legal Opinion
Jack A. Lemon and Martin De Bruin v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 30, 1960No. 16468PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMLEY, Circuit Judge.
Jack A. Lemon and Martin de Bruin were jointly tried and convicted on all counts of a five-count indictment charging use of the mails to defraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 1341.1 The activity in connection with which they were convicted involved the sale of booklets entitling the purchaser to receive certain articles and services from Honolulu merchants. The sales were made over the telephone, and the orders were filled and payments obtained by means of C.O.D. mailings.
Appealing to this court, defendants contend that the evidence is insufficient to support the jury…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Marshall T. Gregory v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- United States v. SylvanusCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
- Gottfried William Kreuter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Norman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
- Bernard Stein v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
3Cited by27 opinions
- United States v. Gary HalbertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Jerry R. BohonusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Meyer Harris Cohen, AKA Michael 'Mickey' Cohen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- United States v. BrienCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Stanley F. Kreimer, Charles Lamar Lewis and Harry L. WalshCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.