Legal Opinion

United States v. Stanley F. Kreimer, Charles Lamar Lewis and Harry L. Walsh

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 2, 1980No. 78-5171PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALVIN B. RUBIN, Circuit Judge:

The mail fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1341, condemns any scheme to defraud in which the mails are used. United States v. Frick, 5 Cir. 1979, 588 F.2d 531, 536; United States v. Melvin, 5 Cir. 1977, 544 F.2d 767, 773, cert. denied 430 U.S. 910, 97 S.Ct. 1184, 51 L.Ed.2d 587. The statute does not forbid merely the use of the mails to perpetrate an act made criminal by state or federal law; it reaches any plan, consummated by the use of the mails, in which artifice or deceit is employed to obtain something of value with the intention of depriving the owner of his…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Cox v. Chesapeake & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States v. Theodore J. Isaacs and Otto Kerner, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
  4. United States v. Earl BushCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
  5. Howard A. Blachly and Robert L. McMillen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Kehr Packages, Inc. v. Fidelcor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  2. Ronald O. Pelletier v. Gary D. Zweifel, Ronald O. Pelletier v. Gary D. ZweifelCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  3. Johnson Enterprises of Jacksonville, Inc. v. FPL Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  4. McLaughlin v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. Michael C. CoyleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API