People v. D.L.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BUTZ, J.
The minor, D.L., appeals from the juvenile adjudications finding he committed two burglaries in May 2010. His sole contention on appeal is that the juvenile court erred in failing to hold the required hearing to consider his suitability for deferred entry of judgment (DEJ). We agree and shall reverse and remand.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND1
On August 30, 2010, a juvenile wardship petition was filed charging 15-year-old D.L. with two counts of residential burglary. (Pen. Code, § 459.) On September 7, 2010, the prosecuting attorney filed a determination of eligibility for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. RamirezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. Mario C.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- People v. Ronnie P.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- People v. ZunigaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re Bryan C. CA1/5California Court of Appeal · 2013
- In re D.F. CA3California Court of Appeal · 2014
- In re Frances G. CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2014
- In re J.C. CA5California Court of Appeal · 2020
- In re J.M.California Court of Appeal · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.