In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas Addressed to Sentinel Financial Instruments
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TENNEY, District Judge.
This is a motion under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 17(c) by Sentinel Financial Instruments (“SFI”) and Michael Senft (“Senft”), a principal of SFI, to quash grand jury subpoenas requiring the production of SFI business documents. The subpoenas were served on SFI and Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz (“Wachtell, Lipton”), SFI’s counsel. The movants claim that Senft is entitled to assert his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination to immunize SFI’s records from production and that the documents in possession of Wachtell, Lipton are protected by the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Couch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Bellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Grand Jury Subpoenas Addressed to Sentinel Financial Instruments, in ReCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Paramount Pictures Corp. v. MiskinisMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
- Paramount Pictures Corp. v. MiskinisMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
- Sentinel Financial Instruments v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Slone-Stiver v. Broock (In Re Tower Metal Alloy Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1996