Legal Opinion
Schrimpsher v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided November 28, 1925No. A-5129PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.
From a conviction in the district court of Oklahoma county for the crime of conjoint robbery, the plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, has appealed.
The record discloses that the defendant, together with one Homer Arthur and Lige Hopcus, were informed against for the crime of conjoint robbery. The case was tried on the 28th day of September, 1923. On the 25th day of September the defendant had been tried in the same court upon another charge of conjoint robbery, which trial resulted in a hung jury. On an examination of the jurors on their voir dire, it developed that 9 of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1908
- Turner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
- Temple v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1918
- Scribner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
- Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hamilton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1944
- Popp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
- Weber v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
- Moffitt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930
- Bills v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.