Smith v. State
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtWashburn, J.
The record does not disclose that the defendant knew any of said guests or that they were ever at said place previous to that evening, nor anything as to their previous knowledge of said place; but -if we may reasonably 'infer that defendant’s evident policy of noninterference with guests who brought liquor to Ills place was known to G. and said other similar guests and was considered by them in choosing where they would go to drink their liquor, still there is no evidence whatever of any act by the defendant from which it may be reasonably inferred that he in any manner aided, abetted or…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. FarrarSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- State v. PeasleyWashington Supreme Court · 1914
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. SimsOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
- State v. TrocodaroOhio Court of Appeals · 1973
- City of Columbus v. RussellOhio Court of Appeals · 1973
- State v. DanielsOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. Brown, Ca2006-10-120 (10-29-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.