State v. Peasley

Appellant was joined with two others in an information charging grand larceny. He was tried separately and, having been convicted, appeals.

The only error we are disposed to notice is an exception to an instruction given to the jury, and since this raises a question of law only, no attention will be given to the facts. The instruction complained of is this:

“To convict the defendant it is not necessary that you should find that he personally stole the money of Soter, if the same was stolen, but if it was taken by either of his *100co-defendants with his aid or assent, with intent to deprive said…