Legal Opinion

Kentucky Utilities Co. v. Consolidated Tel. Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 28, 1952PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LATIMER, Justice.

The chief question is whether the damage to appellee was caused by the negligent acts of appellant.

Appellant operates a power transmission system in the city of Irvine. Appellee operates a telephone system in Irvine and adjacent territory. Power lines for its power distribution are maintained by appellant on the south side of Broadway, running east and west. Appellee’s cables are situated on the north side of Broadway. At the corner of Lilly and Broadway, appellee had a messenger cable, running at right angles to the appellant’s power line and some ten-tó twelve feet below…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Trevillian v. BoswellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  2. Reed v. Mercer County Fiscal CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  3. Ben Gorham Company v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  4. Inter-County Rural Electric Co-Operative Corp. v. ReevesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
  5. Chicago, St. Louis & New Orleans Railroad v. HooverCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ten Broeck Dupont, Inc. v. BrooksKentucky Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Beasley v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1960
  3. Level 3 Communications, LLC v. TNT Construction, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2016
  4. Andrew McMichael v. Commonwealth of KentuckyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2021
  5. Ten Broeck Dupont, Inc. v. BrooksKentucky Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API