Legal Opinion
Conti v. Citrin
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 8, 1985PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Edward J. Greenfield, J.
Plaintiffs have moved to reargue the prior decision of this *835court dated September 4, 1984, denying their motion to enjoin defendant Herbert Citrin from subletting an apartment they claim rights to. Alan Citrin, son of defendant Herbert Citrin, has moved to intervene, and his motion has previously been granted. Defendant Herbert Citrin has cross-moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action under CPLR 3211 (a), and defendant Melohn Properties has moved for summary judgment pursuant to CPLR 3212 as against defendant Herbert…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Belgium, S.A. v. Phosphate Chemicals Export Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Vance v. Century Apartments AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Cooper v. SchubeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Hutchins v. Conciliation & Appeals BoardNew York Supreme Court · 1984
- Yellon v. Reiner-Kaiser AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Helfand v. SesslerCivil Court of the City of New York · 2002
- Conti v.CitrinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991