Legal Opinion
Clarke v. Stalder
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided September 1, 1998No. 96-30313PublishedCited by 161 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge:
We granted rehearing en banc to consider whether the Supreme Court’s decisions in Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994), and Edwards v. Balisok, 520 U.S. 641, 117 S.Ct. 1584, 137 L.Ed.2d 906 (1997), bar Charles W. Clarke, a Louisiana state prisoner,. from bringing a facial challenge to a portion of Rule 3 of the Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections’ Disciplinary Rules and Procedures for Adult Prisoners (“Rule 3”) in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action when Clarke has not yet had his “conviction” reversed, expunged, or…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Edwards v. BalisokSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Neal v. ShimodaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Orellana v. KyleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by161 opinions
- Malchi v. ThalerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Whitehead v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Freeman v. Texas Department of Criminal JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Layne Aucoin v. Andrew CupilCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
156 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.