Legal Opinion

Orellana v. Kyle

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 14, 1995No. 95-50252UnpublishedCited by 302 opinions

1Per curiam

Samuel Orellana, a Texas state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis (IFP), filed a civil right suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Jack Kyle in his official capacity as Chairman of the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles. Orellana alleged that parole review procedures violated the due process clause. He also alleged that a change in rules governing the scheduling of parole reconsideration hearings violated the Ex Post Facto Clause. Orellana sought in-junctive relief only. A magistrate judge recommended dismissing Orellana’s suit, with prejudice, as frivolous pursuant to 28…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Vitek v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by302 opinions

  1. Geiger v. JowersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  2. Marcus Allan McIntosh v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  3. Morgan v. SwansonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
  4. Eason v. ThalerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  5. Johnson v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997

297 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API