Legal Opinion

Johnson v. . Noles

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 18, 1944PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, J.

The first and second assignments of error are directed to the refusal of his Honor to allow the defendants’ motion for judgment of nonsuit, made at the close of plaintiff’s evidence and renewed at the close of all the evidence.

The defendants contend that the option was a unilateral contract, and in order for the plaintiff to avail himself of the benefits thereof he was required to comply unconditionally with the terms of the option. There fore, they insist that it was not enough for the plaintiff to be ready, able and willing to pay the balance of $5,000.00 and take a deed, according to the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Barton v. GrayMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Bateman v. . HopkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  3. Winders v. . KenanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  4. Trogden v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  5. Cummins v. BeaversSupreme Court of Virginia · 1904

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kidd v. EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Country Club Oil Co. v. LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  3. Hardee's Food Systems, Inc. v. HicksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  4. Harvey v. . LinkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  5. Fletcher v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API