Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Skelly

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided December 18, 1926PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an application to compel a bidder at a sale of mortgaged premises to complete his bid and a counter application by the bidder to be relieved thereof.

The only point made on behalf of the bidder that has caused me any concern is the one in which he attacks the conveyance from Grunbaum to Fischer. It appears to be conceded that, in the chain of title under which the mortgagor claimed, Elizabeth Grunbaum executed a deed to Mads Fischer conveying the mortgaged premises prior to the execution of the mortgage which has been foreclosed herein, and that while her husband signed his name…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johannessen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Allen v. HanksSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Silver v. CampbellNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1875
  4. Wright v. PellNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1918

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gerhardt v. SullivanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
  2. Walker v. BennettNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API