Legal Opinion · Dissent

Koon v. Empey

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1924Published

1Dissent

WILLIAM A. LEE, J.,

Dissenting. — The only question presented by this appeal is this: Did th© trial court err in refusing to allow appellants to show by extrinsic evidence that a deed executed by appellant Olive in 1905, conveying certain premises to respondent, was not intended by either of the parties to the conveyance to include a water right with the land? At this time the suit of Rexburg Irr. Co. et al. v. Teton Irr. Canal Co. et al. was pending in the district court. The purpose of that action, among other things, was to have a judicial determination of the right of appellant Olive to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strickler v. City of Colorado SpringsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
  2. Hall v. BlackmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Hard v. Boise City Irrigation & Land Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Arnett v. LinhartSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
  5. Bergen v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1912

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API