United States v. Sanford Ltd.
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BERYL A. HOWELL, District Judge.
' Pending before the Court is Defendant Sanford Ltd.’s (“Sanford’s”) motion in 'limine to exclude evidence regarding the alleged monetary proceeds obtained by Sanford as a result of the offload of fish cargo from the fishing vessel San Nikunau. See Def.’s Mot. In Limine to Exclude Evid. of Monetary Proceeds (“Def.’s Mot. In Limine ”) at 1, ECF No. 143. To the extent that Sanford merely argues that all evidence of monetary proceeds earned from the fishing activities aboard the San Nikunau are either irrelevant under Fed. R.Evid. 402 or unfairly…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Hughey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Southern Union Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- United States v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- United States v. McNairCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States ex rel. O'Donnell v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- United States v. SigillitoDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2012
- United States v. Citgo Petroleum Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2012