Legal Opinion

WATCH v. Harris

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 25, 1979No. Nos. 858, 931, Dockets 79-7030, 79-7100PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OAKES, Circuit Judge:

An ongoing urban renewal project in the heart of a small New England city has evidently awakened in the minds and hearts of local citizens concern about the historical heritage that the project impinges upon. The citizens formed the plaintiff organization by the acronym WATCH, Waterbury Action to Conserve Our Heritage, Inc., and the organization brought suit against three individual federal officials, the Secretary, Regional Administrator, and Area Director of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, hereinafter collectively called HUD, and against…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)Supreme Court of the United States · 1973

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Apache Survival Coalition v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  2. Boarhead Corporation v. Edwin B. Erickson, Region Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region IIICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  3. Thomas Davis v. United Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
  4. Morris County Trust for Historic Preservation v. PierceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  5. Preservation Coalition, Inc. v. PierceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API