Legal Opinion

In re City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1907PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion to set aside awards made by commissioners.

1Opinion of the CourtTompkins, J.

The corporation counsel seeks to set aside the report, on the grounds, first, that the awards are excessive, and, second, that the commissioners proceeded upon an' erroneous theory in estimating the value of the lands with buildings thereon, and in admitting improper and incompetent evidence respecting the cost and structural value of buildings upon the properties in question.

An award will not be set aside for inadequacy, or because excessive (unless the award shocks the court’s sense of justice), or for technical errors in the admission or exclusion *312of evidence, unless the award is the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Village of St. Johnsville v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  2. In re City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  3. Stuart v. HamiltonIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Stauffer v. Cincinnati, Richmond & Muncie RailroadIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re SimmonsNew York Supreme Court · 1908
  2. In Re Acquiring Title by City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API