Legal Opinion

Bell v. State Highway Commission

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1954No. 9380PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MR. JUSTICE FREEBOURN:

Horace D. Bell, plaintiff and respondent, instituted this action in the district court for the purpose of obtaining a declaratory judgment determining the rights and status of himself and others similarly situated, and those of the Montana state highway commission, defendant and appellant, with relation to the application of class A fees provided for in Chapter 139, Laws of 1953. After hearing, the district court rendered its judgment in favor of Bell and the highway commission appealed therefrom.

The action arises from an amendment, made by the Montana 33rd legislative…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Adkins v. City of LivingstonMontana Supreme Court · 1948
  2. State Ex Rel. Hauswirth v. BeadleMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  3. State ex rel. Rankin v. MartinMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  4. State v. KnilansMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  5. State Ex Rel. St. George v. Justice Court of Silver Bow TownshipMontana Supreme Court · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Miller v. MurrayMontana Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API