Kintzel v. Kleeman
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JAMES M. MUNLEY, District Judge.
Before the court for disposition is Defendant Pennsylvania State Trooper Stephen Kleeman’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint of sexual assault and battery in its entirety pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The motion has been fully briefed and is ripe for disposition.
Background
On April 7, 2010, Defendant Stephen Kleeman, a Pennsylvania Sate Trooper, (hereinafter “defendant”) charged Plaintiff Faith Kintzel (hereinafter “plaintiff’) with summary harassment. (Doc. 1, Compl. ¶ 1). A hearing was held on June 2, 2010 at which both…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- A.A. v. CITY OF LANCASTERDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- BASS v. DELAWARE COUNTY DOMESTIC RELATIONSDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
- BATCHELOR v. SIMMONDSDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
- BUTLER v. SISSEMDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- Brown v. MonroyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.