Legal Opinion

Kintzel v. Kleeman

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 19, 2013No. 3:13cv163PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

JAMES M. MUNLEY, District Judge.

Before the court for disposition is Defendant Pennsylvania State Trooper Stephen Kleeman’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint of sexual assault and battery in its entirety pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The motion has been fully briefed and is ripe for disposition.

Background

On April 7, 2010, Defendant Stephen Kleeman, a Pennsylvania Sate Trooper, (hereinafter “defendant”) charged Plaintiff Faith Kintzel (hereinafter “plaintiff’) with summary harassment. (Doc. 1, Compl. ¶ 1). A hearing was held on June 2, 2010 at which both…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. A.A. v. CITY OF LANCASTERDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
  2. BASS v. DELAWARE COUNTY DOMESTIC RELATIONSDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
  3. BATCHELOR v. SIMMONDSDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
  4. BUTLER v. SISSEMDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
  5. Brown v. MonroyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2024

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API