Legal Opinion

United States of America Ex Rel. Melvin Lee Smith v. Charles J. Rowe and William Klusak

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 21, 1980No. 79-2107PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Per curiam

The primary issue is whether a prosecutor’s comments about a defendant’s failure to inform law enforcement authorities of his alibi defense violated his constitutional privilege against self-incrimination and his right to due process. Additional issues are: (1) whether the trial court was correct in finding that the prosecutor’s summation to the jury referred to the defendant’s pretrial failure to bring forth his alibi defense and (2) whether the harmless error doctrine neutralizes the constitutional impairment if it existed.

Petitioner-appellee Melvin Lee Smith requested the district court,…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. William Anthony Brooks v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  2. State v. CrawfordCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1982
  3. State v. BurkeWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982
  5. Cramer v. FahnerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API