Legal Opinion
Shelton v. Oscar Mayer Foods Corp.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided February 18, 1997No. 24580PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BURNETT, Justice:
Shelton claims the trial court and the Court of Appeals erred in holding the factual issues determined during a con tested hearing conducted by the South Carolina Employment Security Commission (ESC) did not preclude relitigation of those issues in a subsequent wrongful discharge suit. We affirm.
FACTS
Shelton was employed at the Louis Rich processing plant in Newberry, South Carolina. In 1987, William Brown, a security guard, told Louis Rich management he had observed Shelton and a co-worker smoking marijuana in the co-worker’s van in the Louis Rich parking lot. Allegedly,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Shovelin v. Central New Mexico Electric Cooperative, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- Hossler Ex Rel. Dows v. BarrySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- Salida School District R-32-J v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Beall v. DoeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Kelley v. TYK Refractories Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Olivieri v. Y.M.F. Carpet, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
- Jinks Ex Rel. Estate of Jinks v. Richland CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
- Williams v. RiedmanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
- State v. BacoteSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- Conner v. City of Forest AcresSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.