Legal Opinion

Martin v. Kiendl Construction Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 17, 1982No. 79-1709, 79-1752 consPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McNAMARA

In these consolidated appeals we are asked to decide whether the wife of a living, injured workman, who himself brought an action for damages pursuant to the Structural Work Act, may recover for loss of consortium under the Act.

Plaintiffs’ husbands brought actions against defendants under the Act for damages sustained when they fell from scaffolding. Plaintiff Sauer sought damages for loss of consortium premised on the Act and on a negligence theory. Plaintiff Martin sought damages for loss of consortium premised solely on the Act. The trial court held that the Act cannot provide the spouse…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Knierim v. IzzoIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Dini v. NaiditchIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Renslow v. Mennonite HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Hall v. GillinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1958

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Harvel v. City of Johnston CityIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Brown v. MetzgerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  3. Bryant v. Kroger Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  4. Zbaraz v. HartiganDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
  5. Pickett v. Yellow Cab Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API