Legal Opinion

Stevens v. Howerton

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 20, 1911No. 7,431PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action by Lillie Belle Howerton and another against Prancis II. Stevens and another. Prom a judgment for plaintiffs, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtFelt, C. J.

Action by appellees against appellants to recover damages occasioned by cutting and removing a large number of valuable trees growing upon the lands of appellee Lillie Belle Howerton.

Appellants filed two paragraphs of answer to appellees’ complaint, the first of which was a general denial. The second averred that the timber was sold, cut and removed with the knowledge and consent of said appellee, who was then unmarried.

There was a trial by jury, and a verdict in favor of appellees, together with answers to interrogatories. Motions for judgment on the answers to the interrogatories and for a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. RoperIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Pittsburgh, Fort Wayne & Chicago Railway Co. v. SwinneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Sunnyside Coal & Coke Co. v. ReitzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. Kavanaugh v. TaylorIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. Shoemaker v. WilliamsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1901

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fort Wayne National Bank v. ScherIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Town of Cicero v. Lake Erie & Western RailroadIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API