In the Interest of S. L. H.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1DissentBirdsong, Presiding Judge
I am gratified that five judges agree that double jeopardy rights given to adults likewise casts a mantle of protection over juveniles. While I do not applaud the manner in which the trial judge is reported to have conducted the initial proceedings, nevertheless for reasons hereinafter stated, I find that not only does double jeopardy apply but there clearly exists an inadequate record to reverse the trial judge.
1. We in dissent have found no appellate cases where OCGA § 16-*283I- 8 was applied to juvenile delinquency proceedings, and the pertinent subsection of the statute, which refers to…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Breed v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Grant v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
- State v. EstevezSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.