Legal Opinion
Ferro v. Bersani
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 16, 1983PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The judgment appealed from and the order of the Appellate Division brought up for review should be affirmed, with costs.
There is an affirmed finding that respondent furnished support for the child, thus tolling the two-year limitation period established by the Family Court Act (§ 517, subd [a]; see Matter of Vicki B. v David H., 57 NY2d 427). There is also a basis in the record for that finding. The limitations issue is, therefore, beyond our review (Laufer v Ostrow, 55 NY2d 305, 311-312).
On the merits, we agree with the Appellate Division that paternity was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Laufer v. OstrowNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Commissioner of Social Services v. Philip De G.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Vicki B. v. David H.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. LewisNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Shirley R. v. Ricardo B.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Commissioner of Saratoga County Department of Social Services ex rel. Ada F. v. Charles G.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Sarti v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Washington v. FieldsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001