Legal Opinion

Loving v. Pirelli Cable Corp.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided June 30, 1998No. Civil Action 97-449-RRMPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McKELVIE, District Judge.

This is an employee benefits case. Plaintiff Daniel R. Loving is a former employee of defendant Pirelli Cable Corporation (“Pirel-li”), a Delaware corporation. Loving is a participant in defendant Pension Plan for Salaried Employees of Pirelli Cable Corporation (“the Plan”), an “employee pension benefit plan” as defined by § 3(2)(A) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1002(2)(A). Pirelli is also named as a defendant in its capacity as administrator of the Plan (“the Plan Administrator”).

On June 26, 1997, Loving filed a…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Angel v. BullingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Nevada v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Ursic v. Bethlehem MinesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  5. Rycoline Products, Inc. v. C & W UnlimitedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Morelia Mexican Restaurant, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2015
  2. AmBase Corp. v. City Investing Co. Liquidating TrustCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  3. Childers v. MedStar Health, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2003
  4. Ghorbani v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. Group Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2000
  5. Estate of Schwing v. Lilly Health PlanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API