Legal Opinion

State v. Henn

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 29, 1995No. 93-0956PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The county court certified two questions to be of great public importance. Pursuant to rule 9.160(e)(2), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, we accept jurisdiction.

The questions are:

WHETHER THE DOUBLE JEOPARDY CLAUSE BARS TRIAL OF AN OFFENDER WHO HAS PREVIOUSLY HAD HIS DRIVING PRIVILEGES SUSPENDED PURSUANT TO FLORIDA STATUTES SECTION 322.2615?

and

WHETHER THE DOUBLE JEOPARDY CLAUSE BARS TRIAL OF AN OFFENDER ON A CRIMINAL TRAFFIC OFFENSE WHERE THE OFFENDER HAS PREVIOUSLY ENTERED A PLEA OF GUILTY TO A TRAFFIC INFRACTION ON WHICH THE STATE WILL RELY TO PROVE AN ELEMENT OF THE CRIMINAL TRAFFIC…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Davidson v. MacKinnonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  2. State v. MurrayDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  3. State v. BlankenshipDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Colby v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API