Legal Opinion

State v. Blankenship

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 28, 1994No. 93-0812PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEVENSON, Judge.

In this case, the County Court of Palm Beach County certified the following question as being of great public importance:

WHETHER THE DOUBLE JEOPARDY CLAUSE BARS TRIAL OF AN OFFENDER ON A CRIMINAL TRAFFIC OFFENSE WHERE THE OFFENDER HAS PREVIOUSLY ENTERED A PLEA OF GUILTY OR NO CONTEST TO A TRAFFIC INFRACTION ON WHICH THE STATE WILL RELY TO PROVE AN ELEMENT OF THE CRIMINAL TRAFFIC OFFENSE?

We accepted jurisdiction pursuant to rule 9.160, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. We answered this question in the negative in State v. Murray, 644 So.2d 533 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. MurrayDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. HennDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  2. State v. CombsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  3. State v. LongDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API